vortifab.blogg.se

• Oversight facebook covid19clark theverge Offline#

Another organization, called the "Real Facebook Oversight Board," is taking up its own docket. The Facebook Oversight Board is not without its detractors. presidency to be following a fascist model." Oversight of the oversight board? In another case, a user based in Brazil argued that Facebook's removal of a post about breast cancer prevention with photographs of female breasts was improperly removed for violating adult nudity guidelines.Īlso appealed: Facebook's removal of a re-shared "Memory" post including an alleged quote from Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi minister of propaganda, "on the need to appeal to emotions and instincts, instead of intellect and on the unimportance of truth." The user argued that the quote is important "as the user considers the current U.S. The user argued in their appeal that the content should not have been removed because it "meant to disagree with people who think the killer is right and to emphasize that human lives matter more than religious ideologies."Ī third hate speech removal involved the Armenian Azerbaijani conflict and the destruction of churches. The user said "their intention was to demonstrate the destruction of cultural and religious monuments." The user appealed to the board, saying they wanted "to raise awareness of the former Prime Minister’s 'horrible words'," the board's synopsis says.Īnother of the hate speech-related cases is about the removal of "two well-known photos of a deceased child lying fully clothed on a beach at the water’s edge." The post's comments, in Burmese, asked why there has been "no retaliation against China for its treatment of Uyghur Muslims, in contrast to the recent killings in France relating to cartoons," according to the synopsis. The hate speech-related cases included one involving a screenshot of tweets from former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad including the comment, “Muslims have a right to be angry and kill millions of French people for the massacres of the past.” Facebook removed the post as a hate speech violation.

Oversight facebook covid19clark theverge Offline#

"Facebook removed it for violating its policy on Violence and Incitement, and in its referral indicated to the Oversight Board that this case presents an example of the challenges faced when addressing the risk of offline harm that can be caused by misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic," the case synopsis says. The COVID-19 misinformation case involved the removal of a video and comments criticizing the French health strategy of "purportedly refusing authorization for use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin against COVID-19, but authorizing promotional mail for remdesivir" from a Facebook group related to the pandemic. The oversight board arose from Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg's idea to have another check on the social networks' moderation processes. Within 90 days, the board expects to have decided on the case and Facebook to have implemented its decisions. Public comment will be taken on the cases until Dec. Hot consumer tech for 2020: Laptops, Nintendo Switch, STEMĮach case will be assigned to five-member panels (the board has 20 members). "As the Board cannot hear every appeal, we are prioritizing cases that have the potential to affect lots of users around the world, are of critical importance to public discourse or raise important questions about Facebook's policies," the board said in a statement accompanying the announcement Tuesday.Ĭensorship or conspiracy theory?: Trump supporters say Facebook, Twitter censor them but conservatives rule social media

The six cases were chosen from the more than 20,000 cases it was referred by users and the platforms. The board was created in October to assess the cases of Facebook and Instagram users who argue their content has been wrongly removed from those social media platforms. The Facebook Oversight Board has chosen the first six cases it will weigh in on: three involving hate speech, and individual cases involving the topics of nudity, dangerous individuals, and the potential for violence caused by misinformation about the coronavirus pandemic. Facebook's independent appeals court is now in session.